The decision to declassify the ninth planet is
greeted with disdain by star gazers. Did they see it coming?
Sunday, Aug 27, 2006
And then there were eight.
After weeks of debate and public speculation, the International
Astronomical Union (IAU)
NATO forces have taken over patrol of
Afghanistan, but with the Taliban re-emerging, the opium trade
booming and reconstruction stalling, that's a tough mission
- How the Stars Were Born
For the first
time ever, scientists are taking an incredible journey to the dawn
of the universe
Questions For Massimo D'Alema
Minister Massimo D’Alema on Europe’s role in U.N. efforts to keep
peace in Lebanon
Not Just Cricket
Simon Robinson on why the game of
cricket will always be about politics
4 issues FREE
Get unlimited access to the TIME
Archive and free delivery to your door
voted last week to demote
Pluto from the solar system's ninth planet to a mere
"dwarf." The implications for astronomy are numerous but not
insurmountable. But what about the world's Scorpios, ruled in the
zodiac by Pluto and now left rudderless? Surely it's a black outlook
"The decision means zilch," says British
astrologer Paul Wade. After all, the moon is a satellite and the sun
is a star, and both nonplanets
staples, he says. In short, celestial class distinctions are moot:
"As long as it's an astrological body, we'll use it."
predicts even less concern among more traditionally minded
astrologers, who use only the five planets visible to the naked eye.
To them, Pluto, which was only discovered in 1930, has never been an
, no matter what its designation.
Right about now, "they'll be saying, 'I told you so,'" says Wade.
Further proof that the universe is a cold and brutal place.